K-pop and Korean entertainment from Korean fans' perspective

SM visuals: 10 years ago vs the present

SM visuals 10 years ago:

Current SM visuals

Pann: SM visuals 10 years ago vs. current SM visuals

1. [+450, -14] I heard that their casting manager was changed. It must be true... How can they cast these kids after TVXQ, SuJu, SHINee, and EXO? The current kids are handsome but the previous kids are handsomer.

2. [+367, -9] Nope, TVXQ is much handsomer

3. [+303, -17] The ex-members of TVXQ are enlisting. I want them to meet, smile, and sing after they get discharged... Although it will never happen...

4. [+139, -6] There was never a perfect idol group like TVXQ before and there will never be one. Their average talent is the top. Their personalities, faces, heights, bodies, and other factors are also the best. They don't have a bad dancer. Junsu, the great singer, was the second best dancer. They could pull of any concept and the five members had a variety of images. They're infinite, they also had masculinity and femininity together ㅠㅠ

5. [+98, -0] It was Lee Soo Man's work up until EXO. I don't know about Red Velvet. Rookies system is Kim Young Min's work ㅋㅋ

6. [+92, -8] Visual of a main vocalist

7. [+89, -2] It's TVXQ. Those Rookies have worse visuals than their sunbaes SuJu, SHINee, and EXO

8. [+87, -4] Handsome kid, handsome kid, handsome kid, handsome kid, (sometimes) handsome kid

9. [+83, -1] There will never be another group like TVXQ. No one lacked their visual, their singing was a wall with amazing talents and a huge fandom.

10. [+79, -0] 10 years ago, they were flower boys but they also had manly side. But the new ones are getting more and more feminine ㅋㅋ The visuals are also getting worse...

11. [+79, -1] Wow, TVXQ is fucking handsome

12. [+75, -2] Micky Yoochun's debut was a legendary idol debut, ha...

Back To Top